Discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT. It is worth two (2) points. You are required to respond to the question to get credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You will be able to review every other submission once you complete your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses will not be tolerated. Click the link to review the weekly question.
Chapter 5 presented the University of California Health System’s ERM development and In Chapter 3 presented the approach Mars, Incorporated used to implement ERM . In what ways are the two organization’s approaches to ERM similar? How do they differ? Choose one aspect of each ERM implementation from which the other organization would benefit and explain why.
To complete this assignment, you must do the following:
A) Create a new thread. As indicated above, describe in what ways the two organization’s approaches to ERM are similar. Also, explain how they differ. Choose one aspect of each ERM implementation from which the other organization would benefit and explain why.
B) Select AT LEAST 3 other students’ threads and post substantive comments on those threads, evaluating the pros and cons of that student’s recommendations. Your comments should extend the conversation started with the thread.
ALL original posts and comments must be substantive. (I’m looking for about a paragraph – not just “I agree.”)
NOTE: These discussions should be informal discussions, NOT research papers. If you MUST directly quote a resource, then cite it properly. However, I would much rather simply read your words.