Welcome to the Most Reliable Essay writing Service Online

ACC93210 – Corporate Governance for Managers

by | May 20

Case StudyACC93210 – Corporate Governance for Managers (Online)Assessment 2 – Case Study – Board architecture at Arcelor MittalDUE DATE: Monday, Week 5, 09:00 AMWEIGHTING: 40%WORD LIMIT: 2000 words (excl. references)Please write your word count on the front page!All students are required to submit this assessment via the ACC93210 SCU Blackboard learning site. Hard copy and emailsubmissions will not be accepted and late submission penalties will apply to assignments that are not submitted on timevia the specified Blackboard site.The following questions are all based on the Financials Times article ‘Governance may impede Mittal’s pursuit of Arcelor’and the case study information below.Case Study: Board architecture at Arcelor MittalThe merger of steel makers Arcelor and Mittal in 2006 produced the world’s largest steel company, with 330,000employees and forecast earnings of $15.6 billion. Arcelor had fought a long defensive battle against the hostile takeover,valued at around $35 billion. Arcelor was incorporated in Luxembourg and had adopted European governancearchitecture, with a supervisory board, including employee representatives, and a management board.Mittal was a family company with a tradition of growth through acquisition, in which the founding family still played thedominant role. Arcelor had criticised Mittal for its inadequate controls, because it had many Mittal family members andfew independent directors on its board.In the merged Arcelor Mittal company, the Mittal family retained 43.5% of the voting equity. The new board was 18strong, with chairman Joseph Kinsch, who was previously chairman of Arcelor, president Lakshmi Mittal, nineindependent directors, plus employee representative directors and nominee directors to reflect the interests ofsignificant shareholders.The General Management Board was chaired by the CEO Roland Junck, with the son of Lakshmi Mittal, Aditya Mittal asCFO.Questions1. Assess the post-merger board structure and discuss the pros and cons before reading the Financial Times article.(10 marks)2. Since the Mittal family retain 43.5% of the voting equity can an institutional investor make a significantcontribution to the governance of the company? (10 marks)3. Please read the Financial Times article under ‘Assessment Tasks and Submission’. Discuss the positive andnegative impacts on the effectiveness of the (pre-merger) Mittal Steel board after reading the article andcompare its effectiveness with the post-merger board. (10 marks)Marks will also be awarded for the academic rigour of the paper (10 marks).• Please answer the three questions individually (i.e. one by one), observing Harvard referencing style and a clear andlogical structure, along with the ability to express yourself clearly and succinctly.• Your arguments have to be based on concepts and tools discussed in the topics of this unit and must be supportedthrough direct reference to (academic) literature (recent peer-reviewed journals preferred). The report will beassessed based on your ability to develop arguments supported by relevant and valid sources (please also refer tomarking criteria). You are expected to use at least 5 academic sources (excluding the textbook) to support yourviewpoints. All sources must be properly referenced.• In addition to the academic references, and in case you want or need additional information about the case, feelfree to engage with non-academic literature, i.e. in order to gain a broader and more detailed understanding of thecase study environment, you can mention and use information and facts from valid newspapers, magazines and/orofficial reports. Again, all sources must be properly referenced.• Assignments strictly have to be within the word limit (- / + 10 %)• Where cases of plagiarism are found, students will be sanctioned in accordance with university policy (see Blackboardfor more information).• All students will be required to submit their assessments via the ACC93210 SCU Blackboard learning site, utilising aTurnitin assignment link. Students will be able to amend and resubmit their assessment following a Turnitin review(ie. multiple submissions are allowed up until the due date).A detailed marking rubric (i.e. marking criteria) will be made available on the ACC93210 Blackboard site (see AssessmentTasks and Submission).END OF CASE STUDY
The post ACC93210 – Corporate Governance for Managers appeared first on My Assignment Online.

  

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

The Service Is Okay. I won’t Complain

The writers on the website are courteous and the customer service responds quickly. My paper was handled well; They promised...

Writers here are very professional and are native British

Thanks a lot for helping me out with my PhD Thesis, Writers here are very professional and are native British!!

Jack, The United Kingdom

Very Very Helpful, and On time.

Very Very Helpful, and On time.

Adelio M, Spain

I scored complete A’s in 3 out of four courses

I scored complete A’s in 3 out of four courses

Anonymous, Illinoi Chicago

CLICK HERE  To order your paper

About Essaysmiths Assignment writing service

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Order Now” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for upto 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

 CLICK HERE to Order Your Assignment

 

Recently Posted Questions.

Order your Assignment today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP

X